Urban History (ABPL20034)
Second
Assignment: Class Paper/Blog
Kyle
Huxley (ID: 640 812)
Topic 3A:
Transport and its impact on cities
Throughout
the history of modern cities, development has been inextricably connected to
technological innovation in the field of transport. Transport developments have
been a massive driver of growth, with the development of railways, shipping
channels and later, roads, connecting cities like never before for the purposes
of lifestyle and commerce.
One
particular example of this is seen in the first reading from this week, which
talked about the impact that transport infrastructure had in France under Louis
XIV. At this time, in seventeenth-century France, the development of projects
such as roads, canals and bridges was contracted out by government to private
enterprise, much in the way that public-private partnerships (PPPs) operate
today. In particular, the example of the Canal du Midi was given, a shipping
canal constructed between the
Atlantic and Mediterranean, designed to open up trade routes between the two
very different sides of the continent (Mukerji, 2013). However, due to the
enormous engineering effort required in order to finish the canal, the
entrepreneurs who underwrote the project took on a significant level of risk in
proceeding with the project, and left themselves exposed to massive losses if
they failed. Ultimately, they succeeded in constructing the canal, highlighting
the benefits that can be sometimes found in entrepreneurial partnerships with
infrastructure, as a task that seemed impossible for a government to complete
could be achieved through the will and collective efforts of private
enterprise.
Similarly,
on the other side of the Channel, early Victorian cities such as Manchester,
Liverpool and London were also transformed by the introduction of modern
railway connections (Kellett, 1969), often constructed by keen entrepreneurs looking
to leverage developments located along the path of the railway line. As such,
the idea of commuting later became a major selling point for the Underground
railway in London, as the introduction of the railway offered lifestyle choices
not previously available to those who worked in the inner city. People could
now live well outside of the city centre, and commute to work on a daily basis,
forever shaping the way that we live our lives. This was an issue also picked
up on in the Kellett reading, where it was noted the way in which the
development of these railways blurred the lines between city and rural areas,
as they allowed for swift and convenient movement between locations that were
previously considered to be a vast distance apart. However, while the effect of
these early steam railways was in many cases a positive for those outside the
inner city, it created complications within cities, as railway viaducts were
viewed negatively by residents, because they believed that such viaducts
adversely affected the character of their properties. However, these
connections opened new opportunities for commerce, as firms could build
factories along the railway lines to send their goods between cities.
Locally
too, we can also see how massively transport has shaped the development of
Australian cities, particularly in the case of Melbourne. Here, in the early
days of the mid to late 19th century, the infrastructure in place was well
ahead of the population sprawl, meaning that people were adequately serviced by
public transport right from the point where they moved into their homes, rather
than what we see today, where infrastructure is often promised as ‘coming
soon’. In these early days, the railways
were all private enterprises, designed to turn a profit for investors, which
meant that they were not necessarily in the business of providing connectivity,
and that as a consequence, station locations and alignments were often based
upon areas of intense land speculation. However, these problems were later
alleviated by the public acquisition of the private railways, and later the
continued expansion of the network, which created more opportunities for the
quick and easy transport of goods across and between the colonies, as well as
leading to patronage levels booming to levels equivalent to other major cities
around the world.
In
summary, the examples given in the readings and lecture from this week provide
an insight into the ways in which cities have been shaped by transport
infrastructure. Whether it be a railway, a canal or otherwise, transport
networks have the potential to truly revolutionise the way that cities
function. In terms of their creation, while allowing entrepreneurs to lead the
development of transport can have a number of benefits, it can sometimes become
problematic in ensuring that the right infrastructure is built for cities. This
is a problem that we still face today in planning for the future, however, if
we learn from the experiences of the past, we can ensure that we built the
right kinds of transport infrastructure to meet out future needs.
References:
Kellett, JR 1969, ‘The
railway as an agent of internal change in Victorian cities: the districts and
the suburbs’, The Impact of Railways
on Victorian Cities, Routledge Publishing, Oxon, United Kingdom, pp.
337-353
Mukerji, C 2013, ‘Cartography,
Entrepeneurialism, and Power in the Reign of Louis XIV’,
in P Smith & P Findlen (eds), Merchants and Marvels: Commerce, Science
and Art in Early Modern Europe, Taylor and Frances Publishing, Hoboken,
USA, pp. 248-276
Nichols, D 2015, ‘Lecture
3A: Transport and its impact on cities’,
Urban History: ABPL20034, Tuesday 17th March 2015, Faculty of
Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville
No comments:
Post a Comment